Overview
An effective research workflow combines systematic organization with flexibility. Freiya supports every phase of the research cycle:1
Discover
Find and collect relevant papers
2
Organize
Structure your library with collections and tags
3
Read & annotate
Deep dive into papers with Focus mode
4
Analyze
Use AI to understand and connect ideas
5
Write
Export citations and use notes for drafting
6
Iterate
Refine and expand your research
Phase 1: Discovery and collection
Finding papers
Search strategies:- Forward search
- Backward search
- Institution research
Start with a key paper and find newer work that cites it.In Freiya:
- Add the seminal paper to your library
- Note its DOI
- Use Google Scholar to find citing papers
- Add relevant papers via DOI
Rapid paper triage
Quick evaluation to decide what to keep:1
Add via DOI
Import papers quickly using DOI search
2
Read abstract
Skim the auto-fetched abstract
3
Tag immediately
Add “to-read”, “maybe”, or topic tags
4
Quick notes
Jot down why it’s relevant (one sentence)
5
Continue or deep-dive
Move on or read more based on relevance
Phase 2: Organization
Collection structure
Create a logical hierarchy for your research: Example structure:Tagging system
Develop a consistent tagging strategy: Multi-dimensional tags:Use lowercase with hyphens for consistency. Decide on your system early and stick to it.
Weekly organization routine
Sunday prep (15 minutes):- Review papers added this week
- Verify tags are applied
- Move to appropriate collections
- Update reading priorities
- Plan next week’s reading
Phase 3: Reading and annotation
Deep reading workflow
1
Start Focus session
Open paper in Focus mode
2
First pass - skim
- Abstract and conclusions
- Figures and tables
- Section headings
- Highlight key points (yellow)
3
Second pass - detailed
- Read introduction thoroughly
- Understand methodology (green highlights)
- Analyze results
- Add comments to highlights
4
Third pass - critical
- Evaluate arguments
- Note limitations (red highlights)
- Identify questions (purple highlights)
- Consider applications
5
Summarize
Write summary in paper notes
Annotation best practices
Color coding strategy:| Phase | Color | What to Highlight |
|---|---|---|
| Skim | Yellow | Key findings, main claims |
| Detailed | Green | Methodology, approach details |
| Analysis | Blue | Important quotes for citations |
| Critical | Red | Limitations, concerns |
| Synthesis | Purple | Questions, future work, connections |
| Examples | Orange | Useful examples, case studies |
- Summaries - Paraphrase in your own words
- Questions - Note what’s unclear
- Connections - Link to other papers
- Applications - How it applies to your work
- Criticisms - Evaluate strengths and weaknesses
Note-taking template
Use this structure in paper notes:Phase 4: Analysis and synthesis
Using AI for analysis
Effective AI questions:- Understanding
- Critique
- Synthesis
- Application
Literature matrix
Create a comparison table (use external spreadsheet or document):| Paper | Year | Method | Sample | Key Finding | Limitation | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smith 2020 | 2020 | RCT | 500 | Effect size 0.8 | Small sample | Direct comparison |
| Jones 2021 | 2021 | Survey | 2000 | Confirms trend | Self-report bias | Context |
| Lee 2022 | 2022 | Meta | 50 studies | Moderate effect | Heterogeneity | Background |
- Select papers in collection
- Export as CSV
- Open in spreadsheet
- Add analysis columns
- Fill in your notes
Phase 5: Writing and citation
From annotations to outline
1
Export highlights
Export all highlights from key papers as Markdown
2
Group by theme
Organize highlights by the points you want to make
3
Create outline
Structure highlights into a logical argument flow
4
Draft sections
Write around your organized highlights
5
Add citations
Generate citations for referenced work
Citation workflow
For LaTeX users:1
Tag papers to cite
Apply
to-cite tag to relevant papers2
Export BibTeX
Select papers and export as .bib file
3
Include in project
Add .bib file to your LaTeX project
4
Cite in text
Use
\cite{key} in your document5
Update regularly
Re-export when adding papers
1
Generate citations
Create citations in required format (APA, MLA, etc.)
2
Copy to clipboard
One-click copy formatted citations
3
Paste in document
Add to your reference list
4
In-text citations
Add (Author, Year) references manually or use Zotero/Mendeley
Writing with AI assistance
Ethical AI use for writing:✅ Use AI to:
- Explain concepts you’re reading
- Brainstorm connections between ideas
- Understand difficult passages
- Explore alternative phrasings
- Check logical flow
❌ Don’t use AI to:
- Write your paper for you
- Generate text to submit as yours
- Replace actual reading and thinking
- Avoid understanding source material
- Bypass proper citation
- Always write in your own words
- Cite original sources, not AI
- Use AI as a tutor, not a ghostwriter
- Check institutional policies on AI use
- Be transparent about AI usage if required
Phase 6: Iteration and maintenance
Monthly review
End-of-month routine (30 minutes):1
Review new papers
Check all papers added this month
2
Clean up tags
Remove redundant tags, merge similar ones
3
Update collections
Move papers to appropriate collections
4
Archive completed
Create “Completed Projects” collection for finished work
5
Plan next month
Identify gaps in literature, plan new searches
Semester/project end
Wrap-up activities:- Export everything - Back up your library
- Final organization - Ensure everything is tagged and noted
- Create summary - Write project overview with key papers
- Archive - Move project to archive collection
- Reflect - What worked? What would you improve?
Advanced workflows
Collaborative research
Team coordination:- Use shared chat collections for team discussions
- Create standardized tag systems
- Export and share paper lists
- Coordinate annotation styles
- Regular sync meetings
Multi-project management
Juggling multiple projects:- Separate collections per project
- Use project-specific tags
- Color-code collections
- Dedicated chat collections per project
- Weekly project reviews
Literature review projects
Systematic review workflow:- Define scope - Create inclusion/exclusion criteria collection
- Search systematically - Document search terms and sources
- Screen abstracts - Tag:
include,exclude,maybe - Full-text review - Deep read included papers
- Extract data - Use annotation system consistently
- Synthesize - Use AI to help identify themes
- Write - Export citations and highlights
Time-saving tips
Batch processing
Do similar tasks together: add papers in batches, tag in batches
Keyboard shortcuts
Learn and use shortcuts for common actions
Templates
Use consistent note templates for faster writing
Weekly routine
Set aside dedicated time for organization
Common pitfalls
- Over-collecting - Adding papers you’ll never read
- Under-tagging - Not organizing as you go
- Inconsistent highlighting - Random color usage
- Skipping summaries - Not writing notes while reading
- No backups - Failing to export your work
- Perfectionism - Spending too long organizing vs. reading
- Ignoring review - Not revisiting and refining annotations
Customization ideas
Adapt these workflows to your style: For theory-heavy research:- Add “framework” tag for conceptual papers
- Create “theory” vs “empirical” collections
- Use more detailed note templates
- AI chats for concept clarification
- Tag by methodology type
- Create data/methods collections
- Highlight statistical details
- Note replication considerations
- Multiple field-specific tag sets
- Cross-disciplinary comparison collections
- “Bridge papers” that connect fields
- AI to explain unfamiliar terminology
Tools integration
Freiya plays well with:- Reference managers - Export to Zotero, Mendeley
- Note apps - Export markdown to Obsidian, Notion
- LaTeX - BibTeX export
- Spreadsheets - CSV export for analysis
- Cloud storage - Back up your exports